posted on 2013-07-10, 15:38authored byYi Han, John Fitzpatrick, Liam Murphy, Jonathan Dunne
Voice over IP (VoIP) now has tremendous influence
on the telecommunication market with its flexibility and price
advantage. Users of VoIP expect call quality to be as good as,
if not better than the traditional Public Switched Telephone
Network (PSTN). However in VoIP, factors that are related to
the IP transport network such as packet loss, delay, bandwidth,
jitter, and voice encoding (codec) all affect call quality. Call
quality assessment in VoIP systems is mainly conducted with
off-line tests using the Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality
(PESQ) [1] methodology. Another method that can be utilised
is an on-line approach using the E-Model, which can be used
in real time. However, these two methods have limits and
inaccuracy, and often do not give the same results. Call quality
assessment is often used to adjust system and codec parameters.
Therefore, given inaccurate results, the system would decrease
the adjustment efficiency or even inadvertently decrease call
quality. The primary contribution of this paper is a comparison
between the accuracy of PESQ and the E-Model investigated by
conducting an extensive set of experiments in a real enterprise
network using a widely deployed Voice over IP (VoIP) product.
Experiments were conducted under varying controlled network
conditions. The results show that under various conditions, loss
rates, codecs and across a range of languages that there can
be significant differences between the call quality measurement
obtained when using the E-model versus a PESQ analysis
Funding
A new method for transforming data to normality with application to density estimation