posted on 2012-05-31, 13:41authored bySeamus Galvin, J.J. Collins, Chris Exton, Finbar McGurren
One of the key reasons why ADLs are yet to be adopted commercially on a
large scale is due to shortcomings in their ability to describe adequate interface
specifications. An interface specification that is vague, lacking in detail, too
style focused or too language-specific results in an ADL description with a
restricted scope of use. This paper demonstrates how an XML-based ADL
(xADL 2.0) can be extended to model detailed, meaningful interface
specifications, and is used as part of a simple prototype to demonstrate how
they form an integral part of an architectural description, paying particular
attention to interface-level constraints. The approach is based on the principle
that an ADL's interface modeling features should provide sufficient flexibility
to allow them to reflect stakeholder's interface concerns at all stages in the
lifecycle.
History
Publication
Proceedings of Workshop of Architecture Description Languages;
Publisher
Springer
Note
peer-reviewed
Other Funding information
QAD Ireland Ltd, EI
Rights
The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com