University of Limerick
Browse
Stol_2016_feel.pdf (455.44 kB)

How do free/open source developers pick their tools? A Delphi study of the Debian Project

Download (455.44 kB)
conference contribution
posted on 2016-12-15, 16:12 authored by Martin F. Krafft, Klaas-Jan Stol, Brian FitzgeraldBrian Fitzgerald
Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) has come to play a critical role in the global software industry. Organizations are widely adopting FOSS and interacting with open source communities, and hence organizations have a considerable interest in seeing these communities flourishing. Little research has focused on the tools used to develop that software. Given the absence of formal mandate that would appear in traditional organizations, an open question is what influences a FOSS contributor’s decision to adopt a tool and how workflows get established in FOSS teams. In this paper we report on a Delphi study conducted in the Debian Project, one of the largest FOSS projects. Drawing from data collected in three phases from a panel of 21 carefully selected and well-informed participants, we identified 15 factors that affect decisions to adopt tools and relate those to existing models of innovation and diffusion.

Funding

Using the Cloud to Streamline the Development of Mobile Phone Apps

Innovate UK

Find out more...

History

Publication

ICSE '16 Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion;pp. 232-241

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

Note

peer-reviewed

Other Funding information

SFI, IRC, EI

Rights

© ACM, 2016. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of ACM for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in ICSE '16 Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion , pp. 232-241, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2889160.2889248

Language

English

Usage metrics

    University of Limerick

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC