University of Limerick
Browse
2007_Agerfalk.pdf (682.24 kB)

Modularization constructs in method engineering: towards common ground?

Download (682.24 kB)
conference contribution
posted on 2012-06-26, 08:27 authored by Par J. Agerfalk, Sjaak Brinkkemper, Brian Henderson-Sellers, Fredrik Karlsson, Steven Kelly, Jolita Ralyte
Although the Method Engineering (ME) research community has reached considerable maturity, it has not yet been able to agree on the granularity and definition of the configurable parts of methods. This state of affairs is causing unnecessary confusion, especially with an ever increasing number of people contributing to ME research. There are several competing notions around, most significantly 'method fragments' and 'method chunks', but also 'method components' and 'process components' are used in some quarters and have also been widely published. Sometimes these terms are used interchangeably, but there appears to be important semantic and pragmatic differences. If the differences are unimportant, we should be able to come to an agreement on what construct to promote. Alternatively, the different constructs may serve different purposes and there is a need for them to coexist. If this is the case, it should be possible to pinpoint exactly how they are related and which are useful in what contexts. This panel is a step towards finding common ground in this area, which arguably is at the very core of ME.

History

Publication

IFIP WG8.1 Working Conference on Situational Method Engineering: Fundamentals and Experiences (ME'07;

Publisher

Springer

Note

peer-reviewed

Other Funding information

SFI

Rights

The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com

Language

English

Usage metrics

    University of Limerick

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC