There has been a growing interest in the role of
theory within Software Engineering (SE) research. For several
decades, researchers within the SE research community have
argued that, to become a real engineering science, SE needs
to develop stronger theoretical foundations. A few authors have
proposed guidelines for constructing theories, building on insights
from other disciplines. However, so far, much SE research is not
guided by explicit theory, nor does it produce explicit theory. In
this paper we argue that SE research does, in fact, show traces
of theory, which we call theory fragments. We have adapted an
analytical framework from the social sciences, named the Validity
Network Schema (VNS), that we use to illustrate the role of
theorizing in SE research. We illustrate the use of this framework
by dissecting three well known research papers, each of which
has had significant impact on their respective subdisciplines. We
conclude this paper by outlining a number of implications for
future SE research, and show how by increasing awareness and
training, development of SE theories can be improved.
History
Publication
2nd Workshop on a General Theory of Software Engineering (GTSE) collocated with ICSE 2013