This study presents a method that can be used to accurately determine the thermal performance of a cylindrical
heat pipe. In the method, the heat pipe is placed between two stainless steel 304 cylindrical blocks, configured as
radial calorimeters that achieve thermal contact with the evaporator and condenser sections of the pipe. A
flexible isothermal electrical heater mat surrounds the evaporator block, and a liquid-cooled copper pipe
wrapped around the condenser block is used to remove heat. High precision thermistors (±0.01 K) positioned at
fixed radial locations within the calorimeters are used to measure the heat supplied to the evaporator and the
heat extracted from the condenser. One-dimensional radial conduction is assumed to occur within each calo rimeter, and this enables the quantification of heat flows from the temperature readings. This assumption is
verified by a steady-state analysis of the radial, axial and circumferential temperature differences within the
evaporator calorimeter, based on data recorded for the lowest and highest heat inputs. Furthermore, a numerical
model is used to confirm that end effects have a negligible influence on radial conduction within each calo rimeter. This study concludes that the most commonly used characterization techniques for heat pipes can
greatly overestimate thermal performance (15–32% for input powers of 7.5–25 W respectively) due to inaccurate
quantification of heat flows into the evaporator and from the condenser. The calorimetric technique reported
here achieves uncertainties in thermal resistance of <7.5% for low thermal loads (<12.5 W) and <6% for higher
loads (>12.5 W). Moreover, the method achieves a significant improvement in the experimental thermal effi ciency, with values of >75% recorded for all heat inputs in this study. The use of radial calorimeters in the
current study obviates the requirement for calculating the losses from the heater to ambient, hence achieving low
uncertainties in thermal resistance and effective thermal conductivity for a range of heat inputs.
History
Publication
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science;125, 110381