University of Limerick
Browse
Haege_2017_consensus.pdf (729.72 kB)

Consensus decisions and similarity measures in international organizations

Download (729.72 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2016-02-17, 15:55 authored by Frank M. Häge, S. Hug
Voting behavior in international organizations, most notably in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), is often used to infer the similarity of foreign policy preferences of member states. Most of these measures ignore, however, that particular co-voting patterns may appear simply by chance (Häge 2011) and that these patterns of agreement (or the absence thereof) are only observable if decisions are reached through roll-call votes. As the relative frequency of roll-call votes changes considerably over time in most international organizations, currently used similarity and affinity measures offer a misleading picture. Based on a complete data set of UNGA resolution decisions, we demonstrate how taking different forms of chance agreement and the relative prevalence of consensus decisions into account affects conclusions about the effect of the similarity of member states foreign policy positions on foreign aid allocation.

History

Publication

International Interactions; 42 (3), pp. 503-529

Publisher

Taylor and Francis

Rights

This is an Author's Manuscript of an article whose final and definitive form, the Version of Record, has been published in International Interactions; 42 (3), pp. 503-529 copyright Taylor & Francis], available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2016.1138107

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Limerick

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC