posted on 2017-11-08, 08:54authored byRachel B. Clancy, Matthew P. Herring, Mark J. Campbell
Motivation is widely-researched, in both sport psychology and other fields. As rigorous
measurement is essential to understanding this latent construct, a critical appraisal of
measurement instruments is needed. Thus, the purpose of this review was to evaluate
the six most highly cited motivation measures in sport. Peer-reviewed articles published
prior to August 2016 were searched to identify the six most highly cited motivation
questionnaires in sport: Sport Motivation Scale (SMS), Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI),
Situational Motivational Scale (SIMS), Perceptions of Success Questionnaire (POSQ),
Behavioural Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ), and Task and Ego Orientation
in Sport Questionnaire (TEOSQ). The questionnaires were then evaluated and discussed
in four sections: Development, Reliability, Correlates, and Summary. Bibliometric data
were also calculated (average weighted impact factor) and assessed (e.g., citations
per year) to evaluate the impact of the use of each questionnaire. Despite some
variance in their psychometric properties, conceptualization, structure, and utility, the six
questionnaires are psychometrically strong instruments for quantifyingmotivation that are
widely supported in the literature. Bibliometric analyses suggested that the IMI ranks first
and the SMS ranks sixth according to the average weighted impact factors of their original
publications. Consideration of each questionnaire’s psychometric strengths/limitations,
and conceptualization of motivation in the context of specific research questions should
guide researchers in selecting the most appropriate instrument to measure motivation
in sport. The average weighted impact factor of each questionnaire is a useful value to
consider as well. With these points in mind, recommendations are provided.
Funding
Using the Cloud to Streamline the Development of Mobile Phone Apps