University of Limerick
Browse

Participant characteristics are poorly reported in exercise trials in tendinopathy: A systematic review

Download (1.78 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2021-01-06, 12:52 authored by Sean Mc Auliffe, Vasileios Korakakis, Roger Hilfiker, Rodney Whiteley, Kieran O'SullivanKieran O'Sullivan
Objective: To evaluate the reporting of eligibility criteria and baseline participant characteristics in randomised controlled trials investigating the effects of exercise interventions in tendinopathy. Methods: Randomised controlled trials investigating the effects of exercise therapy compared to a nonexercising intervention in upper and lower limb tendinopathy were included. Data extraction was categorised into the following domains: participant demographics, tendinopathy descriptors, general health, participant recruitment and eligibility criteria. Results: The review included the following tendinopathies: Achilles (n ¼ 9), gluteal (n ¼ 2), lateral elbow tendinopathy (n ¼ 15), patellar (n ¼ 3) plantar (n ¼ 3), and rotator cuff (n ¼ 13). Age, sex, duration of symptoms and symptom severity were commonly reported across the review, while prior history of tendinopathy was poorly reported (6/45). Variables such as physical activity level (17/45), sleep (0/45), psychological factors (2/45), medication at baseline (8/45), co morbid health complaints (10/45) and sociodemographic factors (11/45) were poorly reported across the included studies. Substantial variation existed between studies in the specific eligibility criteria used. Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review demonstrate that participant characteristics are poorly reported in exercise trials in tendinopathy. To improve effectiveness of exercise interventions in tendinopathy, improved reporting of participant

History

Publication

Physical Therapy in Sport;48, pp. 43-53

Publisher

Elsevier

Note

peer-reviewed

Language

English

Usage metrics

    University of Limerick

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC