posted on 2020-06-23, 09:07authored byMary O'Keeffe, Mary Kelly, Eileen A. O'Herlihy, Paul W. O'Toole, Patricia M. Kearney, Suzanne Timmons, Emma O'Shea, Catherine Stanton, M Hickson, Y. Rolland, Sulmont Rosse, S. Issanchou, Isabelle Maitre, M. Stelmach-Mardas, Gabriele Nagel, Marion Flechtner-Mors, Maike Wolters, Antje Hebestreit, L.C.P.G.M. De Groot, O. van de Rest, Ruth Teh, M.A. Peyron, D. Dardevet, I. Papet, K. Schindler, Melanie Streicher, Gabriel Torbahn, Eva Kiesswetter, Marjolein Visser, Dorothee Volkert, Eibhlís M. O'Connor, MaNuEL consortium
Background & aims: Malnutrition in older adults results in significant personal, social, and economic burden. To combat this complex, multifactorial issue, evidence-based knowledge is needed on the modifiable determinants of malnutrition. Systematic reviews of prospective studies are lacking in this area; therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to investigate the modifiable determinants of malnutrition in older adults.
Methods: A systematic approach was taken to conduct this review. Eight databases were searched. Prospective cohort studies with participants of a mean age of 65 years or over were included. Studies were required to measure at least one determinant at baseline and malnutrition as outcome at follow-up. Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Pooling of data in a meta-analysis was not possible therefore the findings of each study were synthesized narratively. A descriptive synthesis of studies was used to present results due the heterogeneity of
population source and setting, definitions of determinants and outcomes. Consistency of findings was assessed using the schema: strong evidence, moderate evidence, low evidence, and conflicting evidence
Funding
Development of a structure identification methodology for nonlinear dynamic systems