posted on 2017-07-19, 07:30authored byAustin G. Stack, Ahmed Alghali, Xia Li, John P. Ferguson, Liam F. Casserly, Cornelius J. Cronin, Donal N. Reddan, Wael F. Hussein, Mohamed E. Elsayed
Background: Although anaemia is a common complication of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), knowledge of quality
of care and management practices in specialist clinics varies. We examined anaemia practices at specialist nephrology clinics
within the Irish health system and evaluated the opinions of practicing nephrologists.
Methods: A multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted at specialist nephrology clinics across six geographic regions
in Ireland. Clinical characteristics and treatment practices were evaluated in a sample of 530 patients with CKD. An accompanying
national survey questionnaire captured opinions and treatment strategies of nephrologists on anaemia
management.
Results: The prevalence of anaemia [defined as haemoglobin (Hb)<12.0 g/dL] was 37.8%, which increased significantly with
advancing CKD (from 21% to 63%; P<0.01) and varied across clinical sites (from 36% to 62%; P<0.026). Iron deficiency (ID)
was present in 46% of all patients tested and 86% of them were not on treatment. More than 45% of anaemic patients were
not tested for ID. Respondents differed in their selection of clinical guidelines, threshold targets for erythropoiesis-stimulating
agent (ESA) and intravenous iron therapy and anaemia management algorithms were absent in 47% of the clinics. The
unexpectedly low rates of ESA use (4.7%) and iron therapy (10.2%) in clinical practice were in contrast to survey responses
where 63% of nephrologists indicated ESA therapy initiation when Hb was<10.0 g/dL and 46% indicated commencement of
iron therapy for ferritin<150 ng/mL.
Conclusion: This study highlights substantial variability in the management of anaemia and ID at specialist nephrology
clinics with low testing rates for ID, high rates of anaemia and ID and underutilization of effective treatments. Variability in
the adoption and implementation of different clinical guidelines was evident.
Funding
Development of a structure identification methodology for nonlinear dynamic systems