posted on 2021-01-14, 11:37authored byAndrew J. Harrison, Stuart A. McErlain-Naylor, Elizabeth J. Bradshaw, Boyi Dai, Hiroyuki Nunome, Gerwyn T.G. Hughes, Pui W. Kong, Benedicte Vanwanseele, J. Paulo Vilas-Boas, Daniel T.P. Fong
The peer review process of original research articles generally requires authors/researchers
to adopt accepted scientific methods, identify testable hypotheses and test those
hypotheses using appropriate and established statistical methods. In Sports
Biomechanics, authors are encouraged to submit original research articles that conform
to these norms. Despite widespread use, null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) has
received criticism on various counts, especially when there is a reliance on p-values alone
(as defined below) for NHST. The p-value combines sample size, variance and differences
in values within the calculation but its meaning is somewhat subtle and difficult to
communicate in non-technical language, leading to over-simplification, distortions of
its meaning and misinterpretation.
History
Publication
Sports Biomechanics;19 (5), pp. 561-568
Publisher
Taylor and Francis
Note
peer-reviewed
Rights
This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article whose final and definitive form, the Version of Record, has been published in Sports Biomechanics 2020 copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at:https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2020.1782555