The legal mechanism by which same-sex relationships are recognised has long been a contentious issue around the world. In many countries, same-sex marriage and civil
partnership (CP) have been met with stark opposition emanating from assumptions of heterosexuality and the trope of the heterosexual family. However, these are not the
only lines upon which tensions around same-sex relationships have settled. Key differences between CP and same-sex marriage have resulted in tensions among lesbian,
gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) organisations. This paper seeks to explore these tensions and ambiguities and argues that the weight of heteronormative expectation
around same-sex relationship recognition results in the masking of a process that (re)produces societal norms and privileges.Firstly, I explore the emergence of same-sex
marriage and CP1 through the examples of the U.S. and the UK. Secondly, in light of these examples, I turn to the case of Ireland to explore how CP has been received and to
examine the politics of how the CP/same-sex marriage divide has been constructed within the LGBT political landscape. Finally, I deconstruct the CP/same-sex marriage
binary that exists and assert that this false binary and the dominant ‘gay agenda’ of marriage (Rohrer 2009) have distracted from a normalising project that sanitises
alternatives to the norm of heterosexuality