posted on 2021-05-18, 14:56authored bySivan Hirsch-Hoefler, Dana R. Vashdi, Robert D. Lowe, Orla T. Muldoon, Stevan E. Hobfoll, Daphna Canetti
A multi-national sample was used to investigate mechanisms that were hypothesized to moderate the relationship between exposure to political violence and symptoms of posttraumatic stress (PTS). We hypothesized that a) the phase of the conflict and b) the status asymmetry of the conflicting parties would moderate the relationship between exposure and PTS symptoms. We used original data from four groups: Israelis and Palestinians (n = 2,572), and Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland (n = 343). Looking at these two conflicts, we found that the positive relationship between exposure to violence and posttraumatic stress symptoms ceases to exist in a post-conflict setting (F(1, 2053) = 4.95, p < .05, η2 = 0.002). Interestingly, we found that PTS symptoms were highest among minority group members in an ongoing conflict irrespective of exposure to political violence (F(1, 2053) = 120.74, p < .001,η2 = 0.06). We provide explanations for these findings and discuss their psychological implications for victimized groups and the wider geopolitics of intergroup conflict.
Funding
Formal Models of the Development of a Critical Mass For Collective Action
Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences
Terrorism and Political Violence;33 (4), pp. 788-805
Publisher
Taylor and Francis
Note
peer-reviewed
Other Funding information
Israel Science Foundation, European Union (EU), National Institute of Mental Health, US-Israel Binational Science Foundation
Rights
This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article whose final and definitive form, the Version of Record, has been published in Terrorism and Political Violence 2019 copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1590342