The FORGE AHEAD clinical readiness consultation tool: a validated tool to assess clinical readiness for chronic disease care mobilization in Canada’s First Nations
posted on 2019-02-25, 09:46authored byMariam Naqshbandi Hayward, Selam Mequanint, Jann Paquette-Warren, Ross Bailie, Alexandra Chirila, Roland Dyck, Michael Green, Anthony J. Hanley, Jordan W. Tompkins, Stewart B. Harris
Background: Given the astounding rates of diabetes and related complications, and the barriers to providing
care present in Indigenous communities in Canada, intervention strategies that take into account contextual factors
such as readiness to mobilize are needed to maximize improvements and increase the likelihood of success and
sustainment. As part of the national FORGE AHEAD Program, we sought to develop, test and validate a clinical
readiness consultation tool aimed at assessing the readiness of clinical teams working on-reserve in First Nations
communities to participate in quality improvement (QI) to enhance diabetes care in Canada.
Methods: A literature review was conducted to identify existing readiness tools. The ABCD – SAT was adapted
using a consensus approach that emphasized a community-based participatory approach and prioritized the
knowledge and wisdom held by community members. The tool was piloted with a group of 16 people from 7
provinces and 11 partnering communities to assess language use, clarity, relevance, format, and ease of completion
using examples. Internal reliability analysis and convergence validity were conducted with data from 53 clinical
team members from 11 First Nations communities (3–5 per community) who have participated in the FORGE
AHEAD program.
Results: The 27-page Clinical Readiness Consultation Tool (CRCT) consists of five main components, 21
sub-components, and 74 items that are aligned with the Expanded Chronic Care Model. Five-point Likert
scale feedback from the pilot ranged from 3.25 to 4.5. Length of the tool was reported as a drawback but
respondents noted that all the items were needed to provide a comprehensive picture of the healthcare
system. Results for internal consistency showed that all sub-components except for two were within
acceptable ranges (0.77–0.93). The Team Structure and Function sub-component scale had a moderately
significant positive correlation with the validated Team Climate Inventory, r = 0.45, p < 0.05.
Conclusions: The testing and validation of the FORGE AHEAD CRCT demonstrated that the tool is acceptable,
valid and reliable. The CRCT has been successfully used to support the implementation of the FORGE AHEAD Program
and the health services changes that partnering First Nations communities have designed and undertaken to improve
diabetes care.