University of Limerick
Power_2019_Effect.pdf (2.04 MB)

The effect of control strategies for an active back-support exoskeleton on spine loading and kinematics during lifting

Download (2.04 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-10-15, 19:26 authored by Axel S. Koopman, Stefano Toxiri, Valerie Power, Idsart Kingma, Jaap H. van Dieën, Jesús Ortiz, Michiel P. de Looze
With mechanical loading as the main risk factor for LBP, exoskeletons (EXO) are designed to reduce the load on the back by taking over part of the moment normally generated by back muscles. The present study investigated the effect of an active exoskeleton, controlled using three different control modes (INCLINATION, EMG & HYBRID), on spinal compression forces during lifting with various techniques. Ten healthy male subjects lifted a 15 kg box, with three lifting techniques (free, squat & stoop), each of which was performed four times, once without EXO and once each with the three different control modes. Using inverse dynamics, we calculated L5/S1 joint moments. Subsequently, we estimated spine forces using an EMG-assisted trunk model. Peak compression forces substantially decreased by 17.8% when wearing the EXO compared to NO EXO. However, this reduction was partly, by about one third, attributable to a reduction of 25% in peak lifting speed when wearing the EXO. While subtle differences in back load patterns were seen between the three control modes, no differences in peak compression forces were found. In part, this may be related to limitations in the torque generating capacity of the EXO. Therefore, with the current limitations of the motors it was impossible to determine which of the control modes was best. Despite these limitations, the EXO still reduced both peak and cumulative compression forces by about 18%.


Study on Aerodynamic Characteristics Control of Slender Body Using Active Flow Control Technique

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Find out more...

The Role of Market Sentiments in Strategic Decision Making: A Behavioral Perspective

Swiss National Science Foundation

Find out more...



Journal of Biomechanics;91, pp. 14-22





Other Funding information

ERC, Italian Workers' Compensation Authority (INAIL)


This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Biomechanics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Biomechanics, 2019, 91, pp. 14-22,



Usage metrics

    University of Limerick


    No categories selected


    Ref. manager