Background Equine influenza (EI) is a highly contagious
respiratory disease of horses.
Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate two rapid antigen
detection kits (Directigen or DFA, and Espline) and a commercial
ELISA for the detection of EI nucleoprotein in nasal swabs.
Method Nasal swab samples from naturally and experimentally
infected horses were used to compare the sensitivity and specificity
of these assays to virus isolation (VI) and real-time RT-PCR.
Results If real-time RT-PCR was considered as the gold standard,
the sensitivity of the other tests in field samples was 68% (DFA),
35% (ELISA), 29% (Espline), and 9% (VI). These tests had 100%
specificity when compared to real-time RT-PCR. A receiver
operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicated that decreasing the
cutoff of the ELISA would increase sensitivity with some loss of
specificity. In samples from experimentally infected horses, the
sensitivity of the tests compared with real-time RT-PCR was 69%
(VI), 27% (DFA), 6% (Espline), and 2% (ELISA). The specificity
was 100% for Espline and ELISA and 95% for VI and DFA.
Conclusions This study illustrated that DFA is the most sensitive
antigen detection test evaluated for the diagnosis of EI and that it
can detect virus in some subclinical infected and vaccinated horses.
The results suggest that DFA is a useful adjunct to laboratory tests
and may be effective as a screening test in a quarantine station or
similar facility where horses are monitored daily.
History
Publication
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses; 8 (3), pp. 376-383
Publisher
Wiley Open Access
Note
peer-reviewed
Other Funding information
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine
Rights
First published by Wiley Open Access in Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses;8 (3), pp. 376-383, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12235