posted on 2019-12-03, 11:34authored byTony Dundon, Adrian Wilkinson, Mick Marchington, Peter Ackers
In this paper we present and assess an analytical framework for examining the different 'meanings, purposes and practices' of employee voice. The data were collected from eighteen organizations in England, Scotland and Ireland. Managers defined voice very much in terms of the perceived contribution to efficiency and tended to downplay notions of rights; however, the linkages between voice and performance outcomes remain problematic. Overall, employee voice is best understood as a complex and uneven set of meanings and purposes with a dialectic shaped by external regulation, on the one hand, and internal management choice, on the other. The evidence suggests that the degree to which voice practices are embedded in an organization is much more important than reporting the extent of any particular individual or collective schemes for employee voice.
History
Publication
The International Journal of Human Resource Management;15 (6), pp. 1149-1170
Publisher
Taylor and Francis
Note
peer-reviewed
Rights
This is an Author's Manuscript of an article whose final and definitive form, the Version of Record, has been published in The International Journal of Human Resource Management 2004 copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/095851904100016773359