Treating an established episode of delirium in palliative care: expert opinion and review of the current evidence base with recommendations for future development
posted on 2018-11-15, 16:39authored byShirley H. Bush, Salmaan Kanji, José L. Pereira, Daniel H.J. Davis, David C. Currow, DAVID MEAGHERDAVID MEAGHER, Kiran Rabheru, David K. Wright, Eduardo Bruera, Michael Hartwick, Pierre R. Gagnon, Bruno Gagnon, William Breitbart, Laura Regnier, Peter G. Lawlor
Objectives—To review the current evidence base for treating episodes of delirium in palliative
care settings and propose a framework for future development.
Methods—We combined multidisciplinary input from delirium researchers and other purposely
selected stakeholders at an international delirium study planning meeting. This was supplemented
by a literature search of multiple databases and relevant reference lists to identify studies
regarding therapeutic interventions for delirium.
Results—The context of delirium management in palliative care is highly variable. The standard
management of a delirium episode includes the investigation of precipitating and aggravating
factors followed by symptomatic treatment with drug therapy. However, the intensity of this
management depends on illness trajectory and goals of care in addition to the local availability of
both investigative modalities and therapeutic interventions. Pharmacologically, haloperidol
remains the practice standard by consensus for symptomatic control. Dosing schedules are derived
from expert opinion and various clinical practice guidelines as evidence-based data from palliative
care settings are limited. The commonly used pharmacologic interventions for delirium in this
population warrant evaluation in clinical trials to examine dosing and titration regimens, different
routes of administration, and safety and efficacy compared with placebo.
Conclusion—Delirium treatment is multidimensional and includes the identification of
precipitating and aggravating factors. For symptomatic management, haloperidol remains the
practice standard. Further high-quality collaborative research investigating the appropriate
treatment of this complex syndrome is needed.
History
Publication
Journal of Pain and Symtom Management;42 (2), pp. 231-248
Publisher
Elsevier
Note
peer-reviewed
Rights
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Pain and Symtom Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Pain and Symtom Management, 2014, 42 (2), pp. 231-248, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.07.018