Assortative mating, the process through which people interactively choose each other as spouses, is a
complex, consequential and informative phenomenon.1 It has important consequences for the structure of
society, for inequality and integration, and it tells a lot about social structures, patterns of interactions and
preferences. However, it is a complex process, and while tempting it is problematic to read preferences
directly from the empirical outcomes. The mapping of preferences to outcomes in a process subject to
constraints is not straightforward. Outcomes are constrained in complex ways, not least the gendered
distribution of the characteristics of interest, the competition among peers for alters with the desired
characteristics, and the fact that alters are agents with preferences too. Additionally, the fact that the
process is dynamic, where the context changes continually, not only because of external historical reasons,
but also endogenously, as the distribution of single people changes as others marry.
History
Publication
University of Limerick Department of Sociology Working Paper Series;WP2019-01