posted on 2022-09-02, 10:11authored bySinéad T. Morley
Breast cancer is the most common malignant cancer form in women and an estimated
318,000 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2017. Metastasis accounts
for 90% of cancer related deaths and the lymphatics serve as the primary route for
the metastatic spread of breast cancer cells (BCCs). The dynamics by which BCCs
travel in the lymphatics to distant sites, and eventually establish metastatic tumours,
remain poorly understood. It has been shown that the microenvironment surrounding
cancer cells plays an important role in determining their behaviour. Therefore,
characterising the fluidic forces that BCCs are exposed to while travelling in the
lymphatics could potentially reveal mechanisms that regulate BCC metastasis. The
goal of this work was to develop a model capable of predicting the surface forces
BCCs experience in the lymphatics by modelling their behaviour using numerical
and experimental techniques.
A microfluidic test facility was developed in which two types of BCCs, metastatic
MDA-MB-231 cells and non-metastatic MCF-7 cells, were subjected to lymphatic
flow rates (Re < 1) in a 100x100µm channel and their response to the flow, in terms
of velocity and spatial distribution, was analysed. The behaviour of the BCCs (η =
dp/W = 0.03-0.81, where dp is the particle diameter and W is the channel width) was
compared to rigid particles of similar size (η = 0.05-0.32) to determine whether
differences in the BCCs morphological properties lead to different transport
mechanisms and ultimately different surface forces. A distinct difference between the
behaviour of BCCs and particles was recorded. Parabolic velocity profiles were
recorded for all particle sizes. All particles were found to lag the fluid velocity, the
larger the particle the slower its velocity relative to the local flow (5-15% velocity
lag recorded). The BCCs travelled ~40% slower than the undisturbed flow,
indicating that morphology and size affects their response to lymphatic flow
conditions. BCCs adhered together, forming aggregates (η = 0.3±0.07 and 0.35±0.05
for the MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells respectively) whose behaviour was irregular.
Single MCF-7 cells (η = 0.14±0.04) were distributed uniformly across the channel in
comparison to single MDA-MB-231 cells (η = 0.18±0.04) which travelled in the
central region (88% of BCCs found within 0.35W≤ y ≤0.64W), indicating that
metastatic BCCs may be subjected to a lower range of flow induced surface forces.
Numerical modelling techniques, using the Dynamic Fluid Body Interaction method,
were employed to quantify the flow induced surface forces acting on BCCs in the
lymphatics. An experimentally validated numerical model capable of predicting the
advection of large particles (η = 0.1-0.4) in confined flow conditions, representative
of lymphatic scales, was created. Both 2D and 3D simulations were carried out
resulting in a total of 25 models. The simulations were in good agreement with the
experiments (<12% difference) across the channel (0.2W≤ y ≤0.8W), with
differences up to 25% in the near-wall region. The maximum shear stress
experienced by the particles increased with increasing particle size and proximity to
the wall. Particles experience a range of shear stresses (0.002-0.12Pa) and spatial
shear gradients (maximum of 0.137Pa/μm) depending on their size and radial
position. Literature indicates spatial shear stress gradients of 0.004Pa/μm are
associated with BCC apoptosis. Knowledge of such values may provide indications
for critical levels of surface forces that cause BCC membranes to react in a manner
that can determine their metastatic potential. Gaining a better understanding of the
complexities of the flow induced surface forces experienced by BCCs in lymphatic
flows will improve prospects for developing effective breast cancer treatments.